> -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Reinecke [mailto:h...@suse.de] > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 12:52 AM > To: KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; > jbottom...@parallels.com; h...@infradead.org; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; > a...@canonical.com; vkuzn...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.com; > martin.peter...@oracle.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] scsi: storvsc: Tighten up the interrupt path > > On 12/13/2015 09:28 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > On the interrupt path, we repeatedly establish the pointer to the > > storvsc_device. Fix this. > > > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> > > Reviewed-by: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com> > > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de> > > Tested-by: Alex Ng <ale...@microsoft.com> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 23 ++++++++--------------- > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > > index d6ca4f2..b68aebe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > > @@ -945,19 +945,16 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct > vmscsi_request *vm_srb, > > } > > > > > > -static void storvsc_command_completion(struct storvsc_cmd_request > *cmd_request) > > +static void storvsc_command_completion(struct storvsc_cmd_request > *cmd_request, > > + struct storvsc_device *stor_dev) > > { > > struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd = cmd_request->cmd; > > - struct hv_host_device *host_dev = shost_priv(scmnd->device- > >host); > > struct scsi_sense_hdr sense_hdr; > > struct vmscsi_request *vm_srb; > > struct Scsi_Host *host; > > - struct storvsc_device *stor_dev; > > - struct hv_device *dev = host_dev->dev; > > u32 payload_sz = cmd_request->payload_sz; > > void *payload = cmd_request->payload; > > > > - stor_dev = get_in_stor_device(dev); > > host = stor_dev->host; > > > > vm_srb = &cmd_request->vstor_packet.vm_srb; > > @@ -987,14 +984,13 @@ static void storvsc_command_completion(struct > storvsc_cmd_request *cmd_request) > > kfree(payload); > > } > > > > -static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct hv_device *device, > > +static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct storvsc_device *stor_device, > > struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet, > > struct storvsc_cmd_request *request) > > { > > - struct storvsc_device *stor_device; > > struct vstor_packet *stor_pkt; > > + struct hv_device *device = stor_device->device; > > > > - stor_device = hv_get_drvdata(device); > > stor_pkt = &request->vstor_packet; > > > > /* > > @@ -1049,7 +1045,7 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct > hv_device *device, > > stor_pkt->vm_srb.data_transfer_length = > > vstor_packet->vm_srb.data_transfer_length; > > > > - storvsc_command_completion(request); > > + storvsc_command_completion(request, stor_device); > > > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stor_device->num_outstanding_req) && > > stor_device->drain_notify) > > @@ -1058,21 +1054,19 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct > hv_device *device, > > > > } > > > > -static void storvsc_on_receive(struct hv_device *device, > > +static void storvsc_on_receive(struct storvsc_device *stor_device, > > struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet, > > struct storvsc_cmd_request *request) > > { > > struct storvsc_scan_work *work; > > - struct storvsc_device *stor_device; > > > > switch (vstor_packet->operation) { > > case VSTOR_OPERATION_COMPLETE_IO: > > - storvsc_on_io_completion(device, vstor_packet, request); > > + storvsc_on_io_completion(stor_device, vstor_packet, > request); > > break; > > > > case VSTOR_OPERATION_REMOVE_DEVICE: > > case VSTOR_OPERATION_ENUMERATE_BUS: > > - stor_device = get_in_stor_device(device); > > work = kmalloc(sizeof(struct storvsc_scan_work), > GFP_ATOMIC); > > if (!work) > > return; > > @@ -1083,7 +1077,6 @@ static void storvsc_on_receive(struct hv_device > *device, > > break; > > > > case VSTOR_OPERATION_FCHBA_DATA: > > - stor_device = get_in_stor_device(device); > > cache_wwn(stor_device, vstor_packet); > > #ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS > > fc_host_node_name(stor_device->host) = stor_device- > >node_name; > > @@ -1133,7 +1126,7 @@ static void storvsc_on_channel_callback(void > *context) > > vmscsi_size_delta)); > > complete(&request->wait_event); > > } else { > > - storvsc_on_receive(device, > > + storvsc_on_receive(stor_device, > > (struct vstor_packet > *)packet, > > request); > > } > > > Hmm. I would've thought the compiler optimizes this away. Have you > checked whether it actually makes a difference in the assembler output?
I have not checked the assembler output. It was easy enough to fix the source. K. Y > > Cheers, > > Hannes > -- > Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage > h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg > GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
