On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 22:39 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > maybe this is better where you have single exit point and so only one > spin_unlock_irqrestore().
We discussed this before. I don't want to put any of the goto messes back in because I don't think it shortens the code or makes it any simpler. [snip] > + > +exit_unlock: > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devdata->priv_lock, flags); > return 0; This should be returning ret. It's less likely that someone will accidentally overwrite or throw away the status later, if the code just returns directly at the point of error. -- Ben _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
