Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for two purposes.
One is to remember processes killed by LMK, and the other is to
accelerate termination of processes killed by LMK.
But since LMK is invoked as a memory shrinker function, there still
should be some memory available. It is very likely that memory
allocations by processes killed by LMK will succeed without using
ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS via TIF_MEMDIE. Even if their allocations cannot
escape from memory allocation loop unless they use ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS,
lowmem_deathpending_timeout can guarantee forward progress by choosing
next victim process.
On the other hand, mark_oom_victim() assumes that it must be called with
oom_lock held and it must not be called after oom_killer_disable() was
called. But LMK is calling it without holding oom_lock and checking
oom_killer_disabled. It is possible that LMK calls mark_oom_victim()
due to allocation requests by kernel threads after current thread
returned from oom_killer_disabled(). This will break synchronization
for PM/suspend.
This patch introduces per a task_struct flag for remembering processes
killed by LMK, and replaces TIF_MEMDIE with that flag. By applying this
patch, assumption by mark_oom_victim() becomes true.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arve Hjonnevag <a...@android.com>
Cc: Riley Andrews <riandr...@android.com>
---
drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 9 ++-------
include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
index 4b8a56c..a1dd798 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct
shrink_control *sc)
if (!p)
continue;
- if (test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE) &&
+ if (task_lmk_waiting(p) && p->mm &&
time_before_eq(jiffies, lowmem_deathpending_timeout)) {
task_unlock(p);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -160,13 +160,8 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s,
struct shrink_control *sc)
if (selected) {
task_lock(selected);
send_sig(SIGKILL, selected, 0);
- /*
- * FIXME: lowmemorykiller shouldn't abuse global OOM killer
- * infrastructure. There is no real reason why the selected
- * task should have access to the memory reserves.
- */
if (selected->mm)
- mark_oom_victim(selected);
+ task_set_lmk_waiting(selected);
task_unlock(selected);
lowmem_print(1, "Killing '%s' (%d), adj %hd,\n"
" to free %ldkB on behalf of '%s' (%d)
because\n"
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 0b44fbc..de9ced9 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2187,6 +2187,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int
flags)
#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
#define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE 1 /* Spread page cache over cpuset */
#define PFA_SPREAD_SLAB 2 /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
+#define PFA_LMK_WAITING 3 /* Lowmemorykiller is waiting */
#define TASK_PFA_TEST(name, func) \
@@ -2210,6 +2211,9 @@ TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+TASK_PFA_TEST(LMK_WAITING, lmk_waiting)
+TASK_PFA_SET(LMK_WAITING, lmk_waiting)
+
/*
* task->jobctl flags
*/
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
