> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 5:33 AM
> To: de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>;
> Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>; Alex Ng (LIS)
> <ale...@microsoft.com>; Radim Krcmar <rkrc...@redhat.com>; Cathy
> Avery <cav...@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: handle various crash scenarios
> 
> Kdump keeps biting. Turns out CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE is always
> delivered to CPU0 regardless of what CPU we're sending
> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD
> from. vmbus_wait_for_unload() doesn't account for the fact that in case
> we're crashing on some other CPU and CPU0 is still alive and operational
> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE will be delivered there completing
> vmbus_connection.unload_event, our wait on the current CPU will never
> end.

What was the host you were testing on?

K. Y
> 
> Do the following:
> 1) Check for completion_done() in the loop. In case interrupt handler is
>    still alive we'll get the confirmation we need.
> 
> 2) Always read CPU0's message page as CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE
> will be
>    delivered there. We can race with still-alive interrupt handler doing
>    the same but we don't care as we're checking completion_done() now.
> 
> 3) Cleanup message pages on all CPUs. This is required (at least for the
>    current CPU as we're clearing CPU0 messages now but we may want to
> bring
>    up additional CPUs on crash) as new messages won't be delivered till we
>    consume what's pending. On boot we'll place message pages somewhere
> else
>    and we won't be able to read stale messages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> index b10e8f74..5f37057 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> @@ -512,14 +512,26 @@ static void init_vp_index(struct vmbus_channel
> *channel, const uuid_le *type_gui
> 
>  static void vmbus_wait_for_unload(void)
>  {
> -     int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -     void *page_addr = hv_context.synic_message_page[cpu];
> +     int cpu;
> +     void *page_addr = hv_context.synic_message_page[0];
>       struct hv_message *msg = (struct hv_message *)page_addr +
>                                 VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT;
>       struct vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr;
>       bool unloaded = false;
> 
> -     while (1) {
> +     /*
> +      * CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE is always delivered to CPU0.
> When we're
> +      * crashing on a different CPU let's hope that IRQ handler on CPU0 is
> +      * still functional and vmbus_unload_response() will complete
> +      * vmbus_connection.unload_event. If not, the last thing we can do
> is
> +      * read message page for CPU0 regardless of what CPU we're on.
> +      */
> +     while (!unloaded) {
> +             if (completion_done(&vmbus_connection.unload_event)) {
> +                     unloaded = true;
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +
>               if (READ_ONCE(msg->header.message_type) ==
> HVMSG_NONE) {
>                       mdelay(10);
>                       continue;
> @@ -530,9 +542,17 @@ static void vmbus_wait_for_unload(void)
>                       unloaded = true;
> 
>               vmbus_signal_eom(msg);
> +     }
> 
> -             if (unloaded)
> -                     break;
> +     /*
> +      * We're crashing and already got the UNLOAD_RESPONSE, cleanup
> all
> +      * maybe-pending messages on all CPUs to be able to receive new
> +      * messages after we reconnect.
> +      */
> +     for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +             page_addr = hv_context.synic_message_page[cpu];
> +             msg = (struct hv_message *)page_addr +
> VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT;
> +             msg->header.message_type = HVMSG_NONE;
>       }
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.5.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to