From: Andriy Skulysh <andriy_skul...@xyratex.com>

Patch for LU-631 which was landed before the upstream merge broke
OBD_STATFS_NODELAY behaviour. It adds unnecessary delay while
running df command with inactive OSTs. We shouldn't try to recover
connection to OST in this case.

Signed-off-by: Andriy Skulysh <andriy_skul...@xyratex.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4010
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7762
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c |    7 +++++--
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
index 7178a02..475ca2f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
@@ -716,12 +716,15 @@ int lov_prep_statfs_set(struct obd_device *obd, struct 
obd_info *oinfo,
                struct lov_request *req;
 
                if (!lov->lov_tgts[i] ||
-                   (!lov_check_and_wait_active(lov, i) &&
-                    (oinfo->oi_flags & OBD_STATFS_NODELAY))) {
+                   (oinfo->oi_flags & OBD_STATFS_NODELAY &&
+                    !lov->lov_tgts[i]->ltd_active)) {
                        CDEBUG(D_HA, "lov idx %d inactive\n", i);
                        continue;
                }
 
+               if (!lov->lov_tgts[i]->ltd_active)
+                       lov_check_and_wait_active(lov, i);
+
                /* skip targets that have been explicitly disabled by the
                 * administrator
                 */
-- 
1.7.1

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to