On 09/12/16 09:58, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> Relational and logical operators evaluate to either true or false.
> Explicit conversion is not needed so remove the ternary operator.
> Done using coccinelle:
>
> @r@
> expression A,B;
> symbol true,false;
> binary operator b = {==,!=,&&,||,>=,<=,>,<};
> @@
> - (A b B) ? true : false
> + A b B
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumi...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index 9544e55..b43f57be 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int issue_probereq_ex(struct adapter *padapter,
> unsigned long start = jiffies;
>
> do {
> - ret = issue_probereq(padapter, pssid, da, wait_ms > 0 ? true :
> false);
> + ret = issue_probereq(padapter, pssid, da, wait_ms > 0);
>
> i++;
>
> @@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ int issue_nulldata(struct adapter *padapter, unsigned
> char *da, unsigned int pow
> da = pnetwork->MacAddress;
>
> do {
> - ret = _issue_nulldata(padapter, da, power_mode, wait_ms > 0 ?
> true : false);
> + ret = _issue_nulldata(padapter, da, power_mode, wait_ms > 0);
>
> i++;
>
> @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ int issue_qos_nulldata(struct adapter *padapter,
> unsigned char *da, u16 tid, int
> da = pnetwork->MacAddress;
>
> do {
> - ret = _issue_qos_nulldata(padapter, da, tid, wait_ms > 0 ? true
> : false);
> + ret = _issue_qos_nulldata(padapter, da, tid, wait_ms > 0);
>
> i++;
>
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ static int issue_deauth_ex(struct adapter *padapter, u8
> *da,
> unsigned long start = jiffies;
>
> do {
> - ret = _issue_deauth(padapter, da, reason, wait_ms > 0 ? true :
> false);
> + ret = _issue_deauth(padapter, da, reason, wait_ms > 0);
>
> i++;
While this part of the patch is technically correct, I would argue it
doesn't improve the code. It would make the code more readable to pass
in the wait_ms value and then have the decision made based on that in
the called function.
Cheers,
Jes
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
