On Monday, October 17, 2016 10:23:00 PM CEST Patrick Farrell wrote:
> Arnd,
>
>
> The description and the actual patch don't seem to match up. Am I missing
> something?
Sorry, I pasted the wrong error message when writing the changelog.
> From: lustre-devel <lustre-devel-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of Arnd
> Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:08:55 PM
> To: Oleg Drokin
> Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; Arnd Bergmann; Greg Kroah-Hartman;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Linus Torvalds; lustre-de...@lists.lustre.org
> Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/28] staging: lustre: restore initialization
> of return code
>
> A recent rework removed the initialization of the successful return
> code from lpfc_write_firmware:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_write_firmware':
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:10333:214: error: format '%ld' expects argument
> of type 'long int', but argument 9 has type 'size_t {aka const unsigned int}'
> [-Werror=format=]
>
> This adds it back.
It should have been this warning:
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c: In function 'lov_getstripe':
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:426:9: error: 'rc' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
return rc;
^~
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:313:6: note: 'rc' was declared here
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
