On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:48:32AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > Ok, I'll rework my patch series to stick with the direct returns. I > personally prefer that approach. I was using the gotos since I thought > that was standard convention in the kernel. >
It *should* but "goto unlock;" When you can tell what the goto does, that's great. But these gotos don't do anything so by definition the names are going to be meaningless. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
