On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:59:20PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote: > That's fine by me. > > I guess the series should then start with a complete move > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h -> > arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv_proto.h, and the remaining patches have to > change the latter instead of the former?
That would be my preference, but we'll need to figure out why hyperv has ever been a UABI header, and if anyone is using it. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
