> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 7:12 AM > To: Cathy Avery <cav...@redhat.com> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang > <haiya...@microsoft.com>; j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; > martin.peter...@oracle.com; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Provide a lightweight option > for Virtual FC Hosts. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:28:57PM -0500, Cathy Avery wrote: > > The patch provides a means to offer a lightweight option to the > > current FC transport class. The new option is selected by a > > driver when it indicates it wants the lightweight > > transport via fc_function_template. > > This need some really good documentation in the code and changelog > what "lightweight" means. It's a pretty horrible term, btw.
This was a concept that James proposed almost a year ago. I agree, we need to document this better. K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
