This one is a false positive. The original code is correct. I was looking through my mail boxes to see the history of this and why it hadn't been fixed earlier. Someone tried to fix it in 2011: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-driver-devel/msg17403.html Then I complained about it again in 2014 when I was looking at a different bug in that same function. Now you're the third person to think this code is suspicious.
I think part of the problem is that get_ir_rx(ir) is hidden as a function parameter instead of on its own line. But really even that wouldn't totally fix the issue. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
