> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helg...@kernel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:39 PM > To: KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de; a...@canonical.com; > vkuzn...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.com; > leann.ogasaw...@canonical.com; marcelo.ce...@canonical.com; Stephen > Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pci-hyperv: Some miscellaneous fixes > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:54:33PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helg...@kernel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 12:04 PM > > > To: KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> > > > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > > > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de; a...@canonical.com; > > > vkuzn...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.com; > > > leann.ogasaw...@canonical.com; marcelo.ce...@canonical.com; Stephen > > > Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pci-hyperv: Some miscellaneous fixes > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:06:40AM -0700, k...@exchange.microsoft.com > > > wrote: > > > > From: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> > > > > > > > > Some miscellaneous fixes. > > > > > > > > K. Y. Srinivasan (2): > > > > pci-hyperv: Fix a bug in specifying CPU affinity > > > > pci-hyperv: Fix an atomic bug > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 13 +++++++++---- > > > > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > I applied these with Long's reviewed-by to pci/host-hv for v4.12 with the > > > following subject lines: > > > > > > PCI: hv: Specify CPU_AFFINITY_ALL for MSI affinity when >= 32 CPUs > > > PCI: hv: Allocate interrupt descriptors with GFP_ATOMIC > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > There were two copies of [1/2], which makes this error-prone. I applied > > > the second one that defines CPU_AFFINITY_ALL. > > > > Thanks again; sorry for the confusion. > > > > > > > > They're both marked for stable, but without any clue about when the > > > problems were introduced or how serious they are, I did not queue them > for > > > v4.11. If you want them in v4.11, please supply those additional details. > > > > I think these issues have been there since the driver got merged > upstream. > > I would want this to be applied against 4.11 as well. Let me know if I > > should > resend > > these patches. > > No need to resend, but I do need more details about what issues these fix > and why they're more urgent than garden-variety bug fixes that are planned > for v4.12. In general for-linus is for fixing problems we added during the > merge window, or other high-priority, low-risk changes.
For sure I want to get this into 4.12. Since it fixes issues that have been there for a long time, (including 4.11), it would be good to get it into 4.11 as well. Regards, K. Y > > Bjorn _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
