Hi!
> That self-referencing mux-controls property looks a bit superfluous:
>
> mux: video-multiplexer {
> mux-controls = <&mux>;
> };
>
> Other than that, I'm completely fine with splitting the compatible into
> something like video-mux-gpio and video-mux-mmio and reusing the
> mux-gpios property for video-mux-gpio.
Agreed, I overseen that.
> > You should be able to use code in drivers/mux as a library...
>
> This is a good idea in principle, but this requires some rework of the
> mux subsystem, and that subsystem hasn't even landed yet. For now I'd
> like to focus on getting the DT bindings right.
>
> I'd honestly prefer to not add this rework as a requirement for the i.MX
> media drivers to get into staging.
Hmm. staging/ normally accepts code with bigger design problems than
that.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
