Hi Greg, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 11:40 AM
> 
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:58:52PM +0300, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yo...@nxp.com>
> 
> Your subject says 'v4' yet the other patches here in the series do not, they 
> say
> nothing, or 'v2', and the 0/10 patch says 'v6'!

I'm tracking the patch versions individually and use the cover letter version 
(v6 currently)
to reflect the version of the patch series as a whole. There are a bunch of 
patches that are either newly
introduced in this series or didn't had multiple versions so I didn't tagged 
them with a version tag.
The patch [10/10] didn't changed since v4 so I left the version unchanged. The 
only change was in patch [07/10]
for which I added a commit message so I bumped the version to v2.
 
> Please fix up and do this correctly.  The _whole_ patch series is versioned,
> otherwise how can I sort them to apply them in the correct order?

Want me to tag all the patches with the same version (that is, v7 for the next 
respin)?

---
Thanks & Best Regards, Laurentiu
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to