On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:45 AM, AbdAllah-MEZITI > <abdallah.meziti....@gmail.com> wrote: >> This patch >> - will always take the lock > > Why? > > "The current code only takes the lock if multiple instances are in use. > This is error-prone, and confuses static analyzers. > As taking the lock in case of a single instance is harmful and cheap, > change the code to always take the lock."
I would argue that it's not harmful, lest people get confused about it. And I agree that this explanation is much more useful than just mentioning the warnings that you saw. Thanks, Frans _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel