On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:48:24AM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Marcus Wolf <li...@wolf-entwicklungen.de>
>
> >From my point of view, the rearrangement of the block of SET_CHECKED reduces
> >the
> readability a lot. I like same stuff to be aligned (all brakets below each
> other
> as a column, all spi->dev below each other and so on) But if it is necessary
> to
> fullfill the rules, we have to do it the new way.
It's not necessary. The rule is just complaining about this:
SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_bandwidth (dev->spi,
rx_cfg->bw_mantisse, rx_cfg->bw_exponent));
^
There is a space after the 'h' character. The old code has
"[space][tab][tab][space](dev->spi,..." it should be:
"[tab][tab][space](dev->spi, ..."
Also the rules are there to improve readability. Sometimes they're
debatable but if they make readability worse, then we can ignore the
rules.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
