From: "John L. Hammond" <john.hamm...@intel.com> With people starting to test security enabled ptlrpc a list_del corruption was reported. The reason for this error was tracked down to wrong arguments to list_add_tail(). In sptlrpc_gc_add_sec() swap the arguments to list_add_tail() so that it does what we meant it to do.
Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hamm...@intel.com> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8270 Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/20784 Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Bob Glossman <bob.gloss...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.ere...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_gc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_gc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_gc.c index 8ffd000..026bec7 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_gc.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_gc.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void sptlrpc_gc_add_sec(struct ptlrpc_sec *sec) sec->ps_gc_next = ktime_get_real_seconds() + sec->ps_gc_interval; spin_lock(&sec_gc_list_lock); - list_add_tail(&sec_gc_list, &sec->ps_gc_list); + list_add_tail(&sec->ps_gc_list, &sec_gc_list); spin_unlock(&sec_gc_list_lock); CDEBUG(D_SEC, "added sec %p(%s)\n", sec, sec->ps_policy->sp_name); -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
