On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:25:50AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <jo...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alex Elder <el...@kernel.org>
> Cc: greybus-...@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 14 ++++----------
> drivers/staging/greybus/operation.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> index 08e255884206..045aaf81113a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> @@ -572,16 +572,11 @@ static void gb_loopback_async_operation_work(struct
> work_struct *work)
> gb_loopback_async_operation_put(op_async);
> }
>
> -static void gb_loopback_async_operation_timeout(unsigned long data)
> +static void gb_loopback_async_operation_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> - struct gb_loopback_async_operation *op_async;
> - u16 id = data;
> + struct gb_loopback_async_operation *op_async =
> + from_timer(op_async, t, timer);
>
Since this one needs to be re-sent any way, could you do this instead of
breaking up the line?
struct gb_loopback_async_operation *op_async;
op_async = from_timer(op_async, t, timer);
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
