> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:30 PM > To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcare...@nxp.com> > Cc: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radule...@nxp.com>; > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > de...@driverdev.osuosl.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:11:35PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote: > > @@ -93,10 +100,10 @@ > > * buffers large enough to allow building an skb around them and also > account > > * for alignment restrictions > > */ > > -#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE \ > > +#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE(priv) \ > > (DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_SIZE + \ > > SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + \ > > - DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_ALIGN) > > + (priv)->rx_buf_align) > > > > Not related to this patch, but this macro is ugly. It would be better > as function.
Okay, will change the macros to inline functions in v2, where applicable. Thank you! Bogdan P. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
