On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:30:53PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> 
> The effective_affinity_mask is always set when an interrupt is assigned in
> __assign_irq_vector() -> apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid(), e.g. for struct apic
> apic_physflat: -> default_cpu_mask_to_apicid() ->
> irq_data_update_effective_affinity(), but it looks d->common->affinity
> remains all-1's before the user space or the kernel changes it later.
> 
> In the early allocation/initialization phase of an irq, we should use the
> effective_affinity_mask, otherwise Hyper-V may not deliver the interrupt
> to the expected cpu. Without the patch, if we assign 7 Mellanox ConnectX-3
> VFs to a 32-vCPU VM, one of the VFs may fail to receive interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Jake Oshins <ja...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Jork Loeser <jloe...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
> ---
> 
> Please consider this for v4.14, if it's not too late.

What would be the rationale for putting it in v4.14?  After the merge
window, I usually only merge fixes for problems introduced during the
merge window, or for serious regressions.  I can't tell if this fits
into that or not.

>  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index 5ccb47d..8b5f66d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>       int cpu;
>       u64 res;
>  
> -     dest = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data);
> +     dest = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
>       pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(msi_desc);
>       pbus = pdev->bus;
>       hbus = container_of(pbus->sysdata, struct hv_pcibus_device, sysdata);
> @@ -1042,6 +1042,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, 
> struct msi_msg *msg)
>       struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev;
>       struct pci_bus *pbus;
>       struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +     struct cpumask *dest;
>       struct compose_comp_ctxt comp;
>       struct tran_int_desc *int_desc;
>       struct {
> @@ -1056,6 +1057,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, 
> struct msi_msg *msg)
>       int ret;
>  
>       pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(irq_data_get_msi_desc(data));
> +     dest = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
>       pbus = pdev->bus;
>       hbus = container_of(pbus->sysdata, struct hv_pcibus_device, sysdata);
>       hpdev = get_pcichild_wslot(hbus, devfn_to_wslot(pdev->devfn));
> @@ -1081,14 +1083,14 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, 
> struct msi_msg *msg)
>       switch (pci_protocol_version) {
>       case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_1:
>               size = hv_compose_msi_req_v1(&ctxt.int_pkts.v1,
> -                                     irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data),
> +                                     dest,
>                                       hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
>                                       cfg->vector);
>               break;
>  
>       case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_2:
>               size = hv_compose_msi_req_v2(&ctxt.int_pkts.v2,
> -                                     irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data),
> +                                     dest,
>                                       hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
>                                       cfg->vector);
>               break;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to