Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> writes:

> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:22:05 +0100
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, this looks like a real issue.
>
>> +    /* Query hardware capabilities if we're called from netvsc_probe() */
>> +    if (!net->hw_features) {
>> +            ret = rndis_netdev_set_hwcaps(net_device, rndis_device);
>> +            if (ret != 0)
>> +                    goto err_dev_remv;
>> +    }
>> +
>
> Rather than conditional behavior in rndis_filter_device_add, it would be 
> cleaner
> to make the call to get hardware capabilities there.
>
> Please respin and make the query of host a separate function.

You mean call rndis_netdev_set_hwcaps() from netvsc_probe()? Will do.

One question though: in case we'll be avoiding
rndis_filter_set_offload_params() call on mtu/channels/ringparam
changes -- can we trust the host to preserve what was there before the
RNDIS reset? In case not we'll have to untangle what is
rndis_netdev_set_hwcaps() in my patch splitting it into two: hw_features
setup and rndis_filter_set_offload_params() and leaving the later in
rndis_filter_device_add().

Thanks,

-- 
  Vitaly
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to