On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:27:39PM -0500, David Kershner wrote:
> {drivers/staging/unisys/include => include/linux/visorbus}/visorbus.h | 0
> .../staging/unisys/include => include/linux/visorbus}/visorchannel.h | 0
Do we really need two different include/linux .h files for this bus
subsystem? Can we merge them both together?
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/Kconfig
> b/drivers/visorbus/Kconfig
> similarity index 90%
> rename from drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/Kconfig
> rename to drivers/visorbus/Kconfig
> index 5113880..a99285a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/visorbus/Kconfig
> @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
>
> config UNISYS_VISORBUS
> tristate "Unisys visorbus driver"
> - depends on UNISYSSPAR
> + depends on X86_64 && !UML
> + select PCI
> + select ACPI
Wait, what? Why are you messing with the dependancies now? And never
do a select if at all possible, do a 'depends on' instead.
And why not UML? What about other arches, why are you now restricting
it? That's an odd change to be doing here in a "move this out of
staging" patch...
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
