On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:31:19PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> On 21 November 2017 at 19:34, Christian Gromm
> <christian.gr...@microchip.com> wrote:
> > This patch takes out the struct device of struct most_aim, because it is
> > not needed.
> 
> Patch 9 adds struct device to struct most_aim and this patch removes
> it. I think not adding struct device to struct most_aim in patch 9 is
> a better way to go.

I agree, this feels odd.

Christian, please rebase the series based on my staging-next branch and
fix up patch 9 so that this patch is not needed.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to