Hi Alexandru,

At 12/28/2017 10:51 AM, Alexandru Chirvasitu wrote:
Ah, of course. Attached is the output of `journalctl --boot=-1` after
booting, getting locked up, and then rebooting a good kernel.

For the Hard lockups on both CPUs after login:

Please try the patch in the attachment by

git am ./0001-x86-vector-Replace-the-raw_spin_lock-with-raw_spin_l.patch

or

patch -p1 < ./0001-x86-vector-Replace-the-raw_spin_lock-with-raw_spin_l.patch

Slightly different version of 4.15-rc5; this one has both patches
applied, yours and Linus' for kexec, but the latter shouldn't make a
difference.

---

You'll see another trace in there that's been bugging me, about W=X
checking. I'm not qualified to judge how related they are, but during
these past few days I've compiled and tested many kernels, and many of
them have exhibited the W+X thing but*not*  the lockups.


Yes, I found it, but I am not familiar with it and have no idea.

Thanks,
        dou.

---------------------8<--------------------------------------------


>From 57d8543ea4dcf2a53b1c37757da12866a52aaf57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:20:48 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86/vector: Replace the raw_spin_lock() with
 raw_spin_lock_irqsave()

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index 750449152b04..a43ca26d5dfd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -726,6 +726,7 @@ static int apic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irqd,
 			     const struct cpumask *dest, bool force)
 {
 	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int err;
 
 	/*
@@ -740,13 +741,13 @@ static int apic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irqd,
 	    (apicd->is_managed || apicd->can_reserve))
 		return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
 
-	raw_spin_lock(&vector_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
 	cpumask_and(vector_searchmask, dest, cpu_online_mask);
 	if (irqd_affinity_is_managed(irqd))
 		err = assign_managed_vector(irqd, vector_searchmask);
 	else
 		err = assign_vector_locked(irqd, vector_searchmask);
-	raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
 	return err ? err : IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
 }
 
-- 
2.14.3

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to