On Dec 23, 2017, at 04:13, Aliaksei Karaliou <akaraliou....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> lu_global_fini() explicitly uses knowledge about shrinker's
> internals to make decision about calling of unregister_shrinker().
> Now this check was integrated into unregister_shrinker(),
> so it is safe to call it against unregistered shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Karaliou <akaraliou....@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com>

> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
> index 8e2e6b89e494..2719abbff85f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
> @@ -1977,8 +1977,7 @@ int lu_global_init(void)
>  */
> void lu_global_fini(void)
> {
> -     if (lu_site_shrinker.nr_deferred)
> -             unregister_shrinker(&lu_site_shrinker);
> +     unregister_shrinker(&lu_site_shrinker);
>       lu_context_key_degister(&lu_global_key);
> 
>       /*
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to