"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <michael.h.kel...@microsoft.com> writes:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <michael.h.kel...@microsoft.com> writes: >> > >> >> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> You added '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' to mshyperv.h which is included >> >>> in >> >>> vclock_gettime.c and pulls in other stuff which fails to expand.... >> >> >> >> Is the declaration of hyperv_reenlightenment_intr() even needed in >> >> mshyperv.h? The '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' is there for the >> >> __irq_entry >> >> annotation on that declaration. There's a declaration of the parallel >> >> (and >> >> unannotated) hyperv_vector_handler(), but that looks like a fossil that >> >> isn't needed either. >> >> >> > >> > True, >> > >> > the only need for the declaration in mshyperv.h is to silence "warning: >> > no previous prototype for ‘hyperv_reenlightenment_intr’"; I'm not sure >> > if this actually needs fixing. >> >> It seems we can get away with dropping '__visible' and '__irq_entry' >> qualifiers from 'hyperv_reenlightenment_intr' declaration in mshyperv.h >> while keeping them in hv_init.c for the implementation. This way we can >> avoid the nasty 'no previous prototype' warning and not have to add >> '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' to mshyperv.h breaking vdso. > > Where exactly is the 'no previous prototype' warning being generated? It is generated while compiling the implementation in hv_init.c, every non-static function needs a previously defined prototype. -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
