This is better. But the subject should say [PATCH v2] and we need a driver prefix.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 06:23:34AM +0900, l4stpr0g...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Kangmin Park <l4stpr0g...@gmail.com> > > enum RT_RF_TYPE_DEFINITION on rtl8723bs/include/rtw_rf.h > is different from enum tag_HAL_RF_Type_Definition on > rtl8723bs/include/HalVerDef.h > > So, update them to be the same reference from > enum rf_type on rtlwifi/wifi.h which recent version. > > As a result, ODM_RF_TYPE_E needs to be updated as well > Therefore, it is updated reference from enum odm_rf_type > on rtlwifi/phydm/phydm_pre_define.h too. > And update some additional code to check more > chip versions that resulted from it. > > Also, fixed some space required errors and > line over 80 characters warnings by checkpatch.pl. Don't do this. It's considered unrelated white space change and it makes the code hard to review. To be honest, I don't know the code well enough to say if this patch is a good idea generally... It seems risky and I wish someone would test it or a maintainer would Ack it. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
