On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:16:59PM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
>  struct posix_acl *ll_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
>  {
>       struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(inode);
> @@ -3043,6 +3044,64 @@ struct posix_acl *ll_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int 
> type)
>       return acl;
>  }
>  
> +int ll_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
> +{
> +     struct ll_sb_info *sbi = ll_i2sbi(inode);
> +     struct ptlrpc_request *req = NULL;
> +     const char *name = NULL;
> +     size_t value_size = 0;
> +     char *value = NULL;
> +     int rc;

"rc" needs to be initialized to zero.  It's disapppointing that GCC
doesn't catch this.

> +
> +     switch (type) {
> +     case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS:
> +             name = XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS;
> +             if (acl)
> +                     rc = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &inode->i_mode, &acl);
> +             break;
> +
> +     case ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT:
> +             name = XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT;
> +             if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> +                     rc = acl ? -EACCES : 0;
> +             break;
> +
> +     default:
> +             rc = -EINVAL;
> +             break;
> +     }
> +     if (rc)
> +             return rc;

Otherwise rc can be uninitialized here.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to