On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 07:11:08PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string,
> which can be used instead of open coded variant.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Quytelda Kahja <quyte...@tamalin.org>
> Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyishe...@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - const DRIVER_STRING instead - per Andy
>
> drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 18 +++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> index 3cdebb8..397ecaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> static struct gdm *gdm_table[TTY_MAX_COUNT][GDM_TTY_MINOR];
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(gdm_table_lock);
>
> -static char *DRIVER_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCTATC", "GCTDM"};
> +static const char *DRIVER_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCTATC", "GCTDM"};
> static char *DEVICE_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCT-ATC", "GCT-DM"};
>
> static void gdm_port_destruct(struct tty_port *port)
> @@ -65,22 +65,14 @@ static int gdm_tty_install(struct tty_driver *driver,
> struct tty_struct *tty)
> {
> struct gdm *gdm = NULL;
> int ret;
> - int i;
> - int j;
> -
> - j = GDM_TTY_MINOR;
> - for (i = 0; i < TTY_MAX_COUNT; i++) {
> - if (!strcmp(tty->driver->driver_name, DRIVER_STRING[i])) {
> - j = tty->index;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
>
> - if (j == GDM_TTY_MINOR)
> + ret = match_string(DRIVER_STRING, TTY_MAX_COUNT,
> + tty->driver->driver_name);
> + if (ret < 0 || tty->index == GDM_TTY_MINOR)
> return -ENODEV;
Very odd rewrite here. Why call this function if you think the initial
parameters are not correct? Are you sure about your test for
tty->index?
This should be cleaned up more please.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
