On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:25:23AM +0800, Zhouyang Jia wrote:
> When usb_alloc_urb fails, the lack of error-handling code may
> cause unexpected results.
> 
> This patch adds error-handling code after calling usb_alloc_urb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyan...@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Fix memory leak.
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c 
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> index 7a0dbc0..6afab4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> @@ -1648,13 +1648,17 @@ static short rtl8192_usb_initendpoints(struct 
> net_device *dev)
>  #ifndef JACKSON_NEW_RX
>       for (i = 0; i < (MAX_RX_URB + 1); i++) {
>               priv->rx_urb[i] = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL);
> -             if (!priv->rx_urb[i])
> +             if (!priv->rx_urb[i]) {
> +                     kfree(priv->rx_urb);
>                       return -ENOMEM;
> +             }

{sigh}

No, you are still leaking memory on all of these changes that you just
made :(

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to