* KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel....@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Ingo Molnar
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:11 AM
> > To: KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
> > Cc: x...@kernel.org; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> > h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; Michael
> > Kelley (EOSG) <michael.h.kel...@microsoft.com>; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
> > enlightenment.
> > 
> > 
> > * k...@linuxonhyperv.com <k...@linuxonhyperv.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <k...@microsoft.com>
> > >
> > > The IPI hypercalls depend on being able to map the Linux notion of CPU ID
> > > to the hypervisor's notion of the CPU ID. The array hv_vp_index[] provides
> > > this mapping. Code for populating this array depends on the IPI
> > functionality.
> > > Break this circular dependency.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 68bb7bfb7985 ("X86/Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
> > > Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikel...@microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c       | 5 +++++
> > >  arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c       | 5 ++++-
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 2 ++
> > >  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Ugh, this patch wasn't even build tested, on 64-bit allyes/allmodconfig:
> > 
> >  arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c: In function ‘__send_ipi_mask’:
> >  arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c:171:4: error: label ‘ipi_mask_done’ used but not
> > defined
> >  scripts/Makefile.build:317: recipe for target 'arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.o'
> > failed
> >  make[2]: *** [arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.o] Error 1
> 
> Sorry Ingo. I had a clean build on the linux-next tree (tag: next-20180702) 
> that
> I used to base this patch. What was the tree you applied the patch to?

If you look at the error message, it won't build against *any* tree, because 
there's no 'ipi_mask_done' label either in the kernel source, or introduced
by the patch.

So whatever tree you used it on, if you build arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.o it 
should 
be broken.

Thanks,

        Ingo
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to