All of the variables used within the structures of the union qos_tclas
cause checkpatch issue due to CamelCase naming. As none the member
variables are used in code all have been changed on one patch.
These changes are coding style in nature and should not impact runtime
code execution.
Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitm...@gmail.com>
---
.../staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h | 66 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
index c352ba0bcd8f..508ed639cda5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_TS.h
@@ -17,51 +17,51 @@ enum tr_select {
union qos_tclas {
struct type_general {
- u8 Priority;
- u8 ClassifierType;
- u8 Mask;
+ u8 priority;
+ u8 classifier_type;
+ u8 mask;
} type_general;
struct type0_eth {
- u8 Priority;
- u8 ClassifierType;
- u8 Mask;
- u8 SrcAddr[6];
- u8 DstAddr[6];
- u16 Type;
+ u8 priority;
+ u8 classifier_type;
+ u8 mask;
+ u8 src_addr[6];
+ u8 dst_addr[6];
+ u16 type;
} type0_eth;
struct type1_ipv4 {
- u8 Priority;
- u8 ClassifierType;
- u8 Mask;
- u8 Version;
- u8 SrcIP[4];
- u8 DstIP[4];
- u16 SrcPort;
- u16 DstPort;
- u8 DSCP;
- u8 Protocol;
- u8 Reserved;
+ u8 priority;
+ u8 classifier_type;
+ u8 mask;
+ u8 version;
+ u8 src_ip[4];
+ u8 dst_ip[4];
+ u16 src_port;
+ u16 dst_port;
+ u8 dscp;
+ u8 protocol;
+ u8 reserved;
} type1_ipv4;
struct type1_ipv6 {
- u8 Priority;
- u8 ClassifierType;
- u8 Mask;
- u8 Version;
- u8 SrcIP[16];
- u8 DstIP[16];
- u16 SrcPort;
- u16 DstPort;
- u8 FlowLabel[3];
+ u8 priority;
+ u8 classifier_type;
+ u8 mask;
+ u8 version;
+ u8 src_ip[16];
+ u8 dst_ip[16];
+ u16 src_port;
+ u16 dst_port;
+ u8 flow_label[3];
} type1_ipv6;
struct type2_8021q {
- u8 Priority;
- u8 ClassifierType;
- u8 Mask;
- u16 TagType;
+ u8 priority;
+ u8 classifier_type;
+ u8 mask;
+ u16 tag_type;
} type2_8021q;
};
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
