On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:17:41AM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote:
> Refactor code by removing array of 'wilc_debugfs_info_t' type and use
> single variable to store 'wilc_debugfs_info_t' struct value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Singh <ajay.kat...@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c
> index edc7287..c5f67c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c
> @@ -78,29 +78,21 @@ struct wilc_debugfs_info_t {
> const struct file_operations fops;
> };
>
> -static struct wilc_debugfs_info_t debugfs_info[] = {
> - {
> - "wilc_debug_level",
> - 0666,
> - (DEBUG | ERR),
> - FOPS(NULL, wilc_debug_level_read, wilc_debug_level_write, NULL),
> - },
> +static struct wilc_debugfs_info_t debugfs_info = {
> + "wilc_debug_level",
> + 0666,
> + (DEBUG | ERR),
> + FOPS(NULL, wilc_debug_level_read, wilc_debug_level_write, NULL),
> };
>
> int wilc_debugfs_init(void)
> {
> - int i;
> - struct wilc_debugfs_info_t *info;
> + struct wilc_debugfs_info_t *info = &debugfs_info;
>
> wilc_dir = debugfs_create_dir("wilc_wifi", NULL);
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_info); i++) {
> - info = &debugfs_info[i];
> - debugfs_create_file(info->name,
> - info->perm,
> - wilc_dir,
> - &info->data,
> - &info->fops);
> - }
> + debugfs_create_file(info->name, info->perm, wilc_dir, &info->data,
> + &info->fops);
> +
Why go through the extra step here in changing this variable from an
array to a single value and not just make the call to
debugfs_create_file() directly with the individual values like you do in
patch 3? It feels like this step isn't needed at all here, right?
What am I missing?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
