The defined constant MIMO_PS_STATIC is used for this test for zero
elsewhere in code so the magic number '0' has been replaced with that
comment, which was actually explicitly mentioned in the comment.
This is a simple coding style change which should have no impact on
runtime code execution.
Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitm...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
index e218b5c20642..13926a83f430 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
@@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ static void rtl8192_update_ratr_table(struct net_device
*dev)
break;
case IEEE_N_24G:
case IEEE_N_5G:
- if (ieee->pHTInfo->PeerMimoPs == 0) { /* MIMO_PS_STATIC */
+ if (ieee->pHTInfo->PeerMimoPs == MIMO_PS_STATIC) {
ratr_value &= 0x0007F007;
} else {
if (priv->rf_type == RF_1T2R)
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
