On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:35:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 12:36:40AM +0530, Bhaskar Singh wrote: > > This patch removed function named rtw_malloc2d. > > > > I removed this function because this function is used exactly once and > > function call have some overhead also. > > > > Maybe this will improve code runtime slightly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Singh <bhaskar.ker...@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c | 10 +++++++++- > > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/osdep_service.h | 2 -- > > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/osdep_service.c | 14 -------------- > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > > index 0fd306a808c4..befc99c197b1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > > @@ -86,12 +86,20 @@ efuse_phymap_to_logical(u8 *phymap, u16 _offset, u16 > > _size_byte, u8 *pbuf) > > u16 **eFuseWord = NULL; > > u16 efuse_utilized = 0; > > u8 u1temp = 0; > > + int z; > > z is unusual name for an iterator. Does it stand for something? Just > use "int i;". > > > + void **a = NULL; > > What does "a" mean in this context? Maybe just say "void **tmp;" > > > > > efuseTbl = kzalloc(EFUSE_MAP_LEN_88E, GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!efuseTbl) > > return; > > > > - eFuseWord = (u16 **)rtw_malloc2d(EFUSE_MAX_SECTION_88E, > > EFUSE_MAX_WORD_UNIT, sizeof(u16)); > > + a = kzalloc(EFUSE_MAX_SECTION_88E * sizeof(void *) + > > EFUSE_MAX_SECTION_88E * EFUSE_MAX_WORD_UNIT * sizeof(u16), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!a) > > + goto out; > > > You can simplify the math a bit: > > tmp = kzalloc(EFUSE_MAX_SECTION_88E * (sizeof(void *) + > EFUSE_MAX_WORD_UNIT * sizeof(u16)), GFP_KERNEL); > > Then if it fails: > > if (!tmp) > goto eFuseWord_failed; > > > regards, > dan carpenter >
Here I have modified 3 files but after seeing comments of Dan Carpenter I have edited one file. What to do with those 2 files which I haven't modified while sending 2nd version of this patch because all three file combinedly making one logical change. I apologies, if this is not the right place for asking this type of questions _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
