On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sep 14, 2018, at 7:27 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> That’s... horrible. In an amazing way. Can you add BUILD_BUG_ON somewhere
> >> to assert that this actually works?
> >
> > Sure, but changing any of the clock ids will cause more wreckage than that.
> >
> I’m more concerned that we add a new one and break the magic
> masking. Maybe two start sharing the same slot.
You are right. The obvious extension is CLOCK_BOOTTIME. That's id 7 which
indeed conflicts. I'll remove the magic.
Thanks,
tglx_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
