On 10/17/18 7:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:14:04AM +0000, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
>> From: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
>>
>> In kvp_send_key(), we do need call process_ib_ipinfo() if
>> message->kvp_hdr.operation is KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO, because it turns out
>> the userland hv_kvp_daemon needs the info of operation, adapter_id and
>> addr_family. With the incorrect fc62c3b1977d, the host can't get the
>> VM's IP via KVP.
>>
>> And, fc62c3b1977d added a "break;", but actually forgot to initialize
>> the key_size/value in the case of KVP_OP_SET, so the default key_size of
>> 0 is passed to the kvp daemon, and the pool files
>> /var/lib/hyperv/.kvp_pool_* can't be updated.
>>
>> This patch effectively rolls back the previous fc62c3b1977d, and
>> correctly fixes the "this statement may fall through" warnings.
>>
>> This patch is tested on WS 2012 R2 and 2016.
>>
>> Fixes: fc62c3b1977d ("Drivers: hv: kvp: Fix two "this statement may fall 
>> through" warnings")
>> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
>> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
>> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
>> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c b/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c
>> index a7513a8a8e37..9fbb15c62c6c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c
>> @@ -353,6 +353,9 @@ static void process_ib_ipinfo(void *in_msg, void 
>> *out_msg, int op)
>>  
>>              out->body.kvp_ip_val.dhcp_enabled = in->kvp_ip_val.dhcp_enabled;
>>  
>> +            __attribute__ ((fallthrough));
> 
> The comment should be sufficient for this, right?  I haven't seen many
> uses of this attribute before, how common is it?
> 

It's not common at all.

Dexuan, please use a comment instead: /* fall through */

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> 
>> +
>> +    case KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO:
>>              utf16s_to_utf8s((wchar_t *)in->kvp_ip_val.adapter_id,
>>                              MAX_ADAPTER_ID_SIZE,
>>                              UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
>> @@ -405,7 +408,11 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy)
>>              process_ib_ipinfo(in_msg, message, KVP_OP_SET_IP_INFO);
>>              break;
>>      case KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO:
>> -            /* We only need to pass on message->kvp_hdr.operation.  */
>> +            /*
>> +             * We only need to pass on the info of operation, adapter_id
>> +             * and addr_family to the userland kvp daemon.
>> +             */
>> +            process_ib_ipinfo(in_msg, message, KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO);
>>              break;
>>      case KVP_OP_SET:
>>              switch (in_msg->body.kvp_set.data.value_type) {
>> @@ -446,9 +453,9 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy)
>>  
>>              }
>>  
>> -            break;
>> -
>> -    case KVP_OP_GET:
>> +            /*
>> +             * The key is always a string - utf16 encoding.
>> +             */
>>              message->body.kvp_set.data.key_size =
>>                      utf16s_to_utf8s(
>>                      (wchar_t *)in_msg->body.kvp_set.data.key,
>> @@ -456,6 +463,17 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy)
>>                      UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
>>                      message->body.kvp_set.data.key,
>>                      HV_KVP_EXCHANGE_MAX_KEY_SIZE - 1) + 1;
>> +
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +    case KVP_OP_GET:
>> +            message->body.kvp_get.data.key_size =
>> +                    utf16s_to_utf8s(
>> +                    (wchar_t *)in_msg->body.kvp_get.data.key,
>> +                    in_msg->body.kvp_get.data.key_size,
>> +                    UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
>> +                    message->body.kvp_get.data.key,
>> +                    HV_KVP_EXCHANGE_MAX_KEY_SIZE - 1) + 1;
> 
> Worst indentation ever :(
> 
> Yeah, I know it follows the others above it, but you should reconsider
> it in the future...
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to