On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:06:19 -0300 Renato Lui Geh <renato...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:20:55 +0000 > "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com> wrote: > > > > This looks wrong. > > I admit this was done in the same way in the probe function, but that looks > > a bit wrong as well. > > > > Typically, the return value of `regulator_get_voltage()` would get checked > > with: > > > > ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->reg); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > *val = ret / 1000; > > > > So, negative values are errors and zero & positive values are valid voltage > > values. > > I see. So -EINVAL is only used when sent the wrong info type? yes. I actually misread what was there and thought we were just talking about using a ret variable rather than returning the error via your local variable. Definitely want to pass on the error from regulator_get_voltage as it may have more meaning than a simple -EINVAL. Thanks, Jonathan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
