On 21.11.18 12:35, William Kucharski wrote: > If you are adding PageOffline(page) to the condition list of the already > existing if in > saveable_highmem_page(), why explicitly add it as a separate statement in > saveable_page()? > > It would seem more consistent to make the second check: > > - if (swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page) || swsusp_page_is_free(page)) > + if (swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page) || swsusp_page_is_free(page) || > + PageOffline(page)) > > instead. > > It's admittedly a nit but it just seems cleaner to either do that or, if your > intention > was to separate the Page checks from the swsusp checks, to break the calls to > PageReserved() and PageOffline() into their own check in > saveable_highmem_page().
I'll split PageReserved() and PageOffline() off from the swsusp checks, thanks for your comment! > > Thanks! > -- Bill -- Thanks, David / dhildenb _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
