Following patches will change the way of distributing port object
changes from a switchdev operation to a switchdev notifier. The
switchdev code currently recursively descends through layers of lower
devices, eventually calling the op on a front-panel port device. The
notifier will instead be sent referencing the bridge port device, which
may be a stacking device that's one of front-panel ports uppers, or a
completely unrelated device.
DSA currently doesn't support any other uppers than bridge.
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB and _PORT_MDB objects are always notified on
the bridge port device. Thus the only case that a stacked device could
be validly referenced by port object notifications are bridge
notifications for VLAN objects added to the bridge itself. But the
driver explicitly rejects such notifications in dsa_port_vlan_add(). It
is therefore safe to assume that the only interesting case is that the
notification is on a front-panel port netdevice. Therefore keep the
filtering by dsa_slave_dev_check() in place.
To handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL, subscribe to the blocking
notifier chain. Dispatch to rocker_port_obj_add() resp. _del() to
maintain the behavior that the switchdev operation based code currently
has.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <pe...@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 7d0c19e7edcf..d00a0b6d4ce0 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -1557,6 +1557,44 @@ static int dsa_slave_switchdev_event(struct
notifier_block *unused,
return NOTIFY_BAD;
}
+static int
+dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(unsigned long event,
+ struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info)
+{
+ int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ switch (event) {
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD:
+ err = dsa_slave_port_obj_add(netdev, port_obj_info->obj,
+ port_obj_info->trans);
+ break;
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
+ err = dsa_slave_port_obj_del(netdev, port_obj_info->obj);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ port_obj_info->handled = true;
+ return notifier_from_errno(err);
+}
+
+static int dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
+ unsigned long event, void *ptr)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
+
+ if (!dsa_slave_dev_check(dev))
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ switch (event) {
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD: /* fall through */
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
+ return dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(event, dev, ptr);
+ }
+
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_nb __read_mostly = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_netdevice_event,
};
@@ -1565,8 +1603,13 @@ static struct notifier_block
dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_switchdev_event,
};
+static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event,
+};
+
int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
{
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
err = register_netdevice_notifier(&dsa_slave_nb);
@@ -1577,8 +1620,15 @@ int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
if (err)
goto err_switchdev_nb;
+ nb = &dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
+ err = register_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_switchdev_blocking_nb;
+
return 0;
+err_switchdev_blocking_nb:
+ unregister_switchdev_notifier(&dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier);
err_switchdev_nb:
unregister_netdevice_notifier(&dsa_slave_nb);
return err;
@@ -1586,8 +1636,14 @@ int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
void dsa_slave_unregister_notifier(void)
{
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
+ nb = &dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
+ err = unregister_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
+ if (err)
+ pr_err("DSA: failed to unregister switchdev blocking notifier
(%d)\n", err);
+
err = unregister_switchdev_notifier(&dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier);
if (err)
pr_err("DSA: failed to unregister switchdev notifier (%d)\n",
err);
--
2.4.11
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
