On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:01:02PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:41:16PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > binderfs should not have a separate device_initcall(). When a kernel is
> > > compiled with CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDERFS register the filesystem alongside
> > > CONFIG_ANDROID_IPC. This use-case is especially sensible when users 
> > > specify
> > > CONFIG_ANDROID_IPC=y, CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDERFS=y and
> > > ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES="".
> > > When CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDERFS=n then this always succeeds so there's no
> > > regression potential for legacy workloads.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/android/binder.c          | 4 ++++
> > >  drivers/android/binder_internal.h | 9 +++++++++
> > >  drivers/android/binderfs.c        | 4 +---
> > >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> > > index cdfc87629efb..751d76173f81 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> > > @@ -5915,6 +5915,10 @@ static int __init binder_init(void)
> > >                   goto err_init_binder_device_failed;
> > >   }
> > >  
> > > + ret = init_binderfs();
> > > + if (ret)
> > > +         goto err_init_binder_device_failed;
> > > +
> > >   return ret;
> > >  
> > >  err_init_binder_device_failed:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder_internal.h 
> > > b/drivers/android/binder_internal.h
> > > index 7fb97f503ef2..045b3e42d98b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/android/binder_internal.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/android/binder_internal.h
> > > @@ -46,4 +46,13 @@ static inline bool is_binderfs_device(const struct 
> > > inode *inode)
> > >  }
> > >  #endif
> > >  
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDERFS
> > > +extern int __init init_binderfs(void);
> > > +#else
> > > +static inline int __init init_binderfs(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  #endif /* _LINUX_BINDER_INTERNAL_H */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/android/binderfs.c b/drivers/android/binderfs.c
> > > index 7a550104a722..e773f45d19d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/android/binderfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/android/binderfs.c
> > > @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static struct file_system_type binder_fs_type = {
> > >   .fs_flags       = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -static int __init init_binderfs(void)
> > > +int __init init_binderfs(void)
> > >  {
> > >   int ret;
> > >  
> > > @@ -568,5 +568,3 @@ static int __init init_binderfs(void)
> > >  
> > >   return ret;
> > >  }
> > > -
> > > -device_initcall(init_binderfs);
> > 
> > I get a build warning when applying this patch :(
> 
> Hm, I can't reproduce that build error with this patch applied to what
> you currently have in char-misc-linus. :(
> Any chance you can give me the config that produced this warning?
> I tried with CONFIG_BINDERFS=y and CONFIG_BINDERFS=n.

$ make M=drivers/android
  CC      drivers/android/binderfs.o
  CC      drivers/android/binder.o
drivers/android/binder.c: In function ‘binder_init’:
drivers/android/binder.c:5933:2: warning: ‘device_names’ may be used 
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
  kfree(device_names);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 8.2.1 20181127

And gcc is right about this warning, that could happen with your change :(

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to