On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:42:36AM +0000, ajay.kat...@microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/4/2019 1:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 07:17:13PM +0000, ajay.kat...@microchip.com wrote:
> >> From: Ajay Singh <ajay.kat...@microchip.com>
> >>
> >> The value of 'vif_num'(interface count) starts with 0, so modified the
> >> loop conditions to execute for all interface.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ajay Singh <ajay.kat...@microchip.com>
> > 
> > The right thing to do is to change ->vif_num = i + 1 in
> > wilc_netdev_init().  That's how it was originally.  Please, add a
> > Fixes tag.
> > 
> > Fixes: 735bb39ca3be ("staging: wilc1000: simplify vif[i]->ndev accesses")
> > 
> 
> Thanks. Sure, I will add Fixes tag and resubmit the changes.
> 
> Can other patches from the series be applied excluding this or should I
> resubmit the complete series?
> Please suggest.

I don't have an opinion on that.  I guess if you just resend them all,
that's the easiest for Greg.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to