Hi Dan, Any suggestion?
On 2019/2/3 10:52, Chao Yu wrote: > Sorry for the delay due to business travel. > > On 2019/1/29 2:30, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:41:55AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >>> Hi Dan and Xiang, >>> >>> On 2019-1-28 21:48, Gao Xiang wrote: >>>> Hi Dan, >>>> >>>> On 2019/1/28 21:33, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>>>> Hopefully, regular kmalloc() is enough. >>>>> >>>>> Do really need the erofs_kmalloc() function? Regular kmalloc() has >>>>> fault injection already. Have you tried to use it? >>> >>> Yes, I think we'd better to use erofs_kmalloc(). :) >>> >>> Actually, fault injection in erofs_kmalloc only affect erofs module, we can >>> expect that the range of fault can be limited in erofs code, rather than >>> whole >>> kernel, so the test point can be aimed at more accurately. >>> >> >> Are you serious? The standard fault injection doesn't do that??? > > Oh, I just realized the common fault injection can inject into specified > module with function granularity, sorry. > >> >> Please fix it instead of creating a duplicate better implementation >> which only your filesystem can use. I would have thought that obviously > > I agreed that it will be good to make common fault injection better, > covering more cases, so that it can benefit all modules which need fault > injection functionality. But rather than injecting kmalloc, there will be > other injection demands from erofs/f2fs, like injecting in the middle of > their specified function, how could we do that? Could you give us advice? > > Thanks, > >> any fault injection framework could at least be configured to test >> specific code... >> >> regards, >> dan carpenter >> >> >> . >> > > > . > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
