On 03/01, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 11:24 -0300, Renato Lui Geh wrote:
The ad7780 supports both the ad778x and ad717x families. Each chip has
a corresponding ID. This patch provides a mask for extracting ID values
from the status bits and also macros for the correct values for the
ad7170, ad7171, ad7780 and ad7781.
Signed-off-by: Renato Lui Geh <renato...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
index 56c49e28f432..ad7617a3a141 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
@@ -26,10 +26,14 @@
#define AD7780_RDY BIT(7)
#define AD7780_FILTER BIT(6)
#define AD7780_ERR BIT(5)
-#define AD7780_ID1 BIT(4)
-#define AD7780_ID0 BIT(3)
#define AD7780_GAIN BIT(2)
+#define AD7170_ID 0
+#define AD7171_ID 1
+#define AD7780_ID 1
+#define AD7781_ID 0
+
+#define AD7780_ID_MASK (BIT(3) | BIT(4))
This also doesn't have any functionality change.
The AD7170_ID, AD7171_ID, AD7780_ID & AD7781_ID IDs are also unused (maybe
in a later patch they are ?).
They aren't. I added them following a previous review suggestion. Should
I remove them?
I would also leave the AD7780_ID1 & AD7780_ID0 definitions in place, since
they're easier matched with the datasheet.
#define AD7780_PATTERN_GOOD 1
#define AD7780_PATTERN_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
