On Wed 2019-04-10 13:17:18, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alast...@d-silva.org>
> 
> Some buffers may only be partially filled with useful data, while the rest
> is padded (typically with 0x00 or 0xff).
> 
> This patch introduces flags which allow lines of padding bytes to be
> suppressed, making the output easier to interpret: HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_0X00,
> HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_0XFF
> 
> The first and last lines are not suppressed by default, so the function
> always outputs something. This behaviour can be further controlled with
> the HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_FIRST & HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_LAST flags.
> 
> An inline wrapper function is provided for backwards compatibility with
> existing code, which maintains the original behaviour.
> 

> diff --git a/lib/hexdump.c b/lib/hexdump.c
> index b8a164814744..2f3bafb55a44 100644
> --- a/lib/hexdump.c
> +++ b/lib/hexdump.c
> +void print_hex_dump_ext(const char *level, const char *prefix_str,
> +                     int prefix_type, int rowsize, int groupsize,
> +                     const void *buf, size_t len, u64 flags)
>  {
>       const u8 *ptr = buf;
> -     int i, linelen, remaining = len;
> +     int i, remaining = len;
>       unsigned char linebuf[64 * 3 + 2 + 64 + 1];
> +     bool first_line = true;
>  
>       if (rowsize != 16 && rowsize != 32 && rowsize != 64)
>               rowsize = 16;
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < len; i += rowsize) {
> -             linelen = min(remaining, rowsize);
> +             bool skip = false;
> +             int linelen = min(remaining, rowsize);
> +
>               remaining -= rowsize;
>  
> +             if (flags & HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_0X00)
> +                     skip = buf_is_all(ptr + i, linelen, 0x00);
> +
> +             if (!skip && (flags & HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_0XFF))
> +                     skip = buf_is_all(ptr + i, linelen, 0xff);
> +
> +             if (first_line && !(flags & HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_FIRST))
> +                     skip = false;
> +
> +             if (remaining <= 0 && !(flags & HEXDUMP_SUPPRESS_LAST))
> +                     skip = false;
> +
> +             if (skip)
> +                     continue;

IMHO, quietly skipping lines could cause a lot of confusion,
espcially when the address is not printed.

I wonder how it would look like when we print something like:

    --- skipped XX lines full of 0x00 ---

Then we might even remove the SUPPRESS_FIRST, SUPPRESS_LAST
and the ambiguous QUIET flags.

> +
> +             first_line = false;

This should be above the if (skip).

> +
>               hex_dump_to_buffer(ptr + i, linelen, rowsize, groupsize,
> -                                linebuf, sizeof(linebuf), ascii);
> +                                linebuf, sizeof(linebuf),
> +                                flags & HEXDUMP_ASCII);
>  
>               switch (prefix_type) {
>               case DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS:
> @@ -272,7 +316,7 @@ void print_hex_dump(const char *level, const char 
> *prefix_str, int prefix_type,
>               }
>       }
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(print_hex_dump);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(print_hex_dump_ext);

We should still export even the original function that
is still used everywhere.

Best Regards,
Petr
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to