On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:30:26AM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> The return variable is used only twice (in two different branches), and
> both times it is assigned the same constant value. These can therefore
> be merged into the same assignment, placed at the point that both
> these branches (and no other) go to. The return variable itself can be
> removed.
> Issue found with Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.li...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_usb.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
Your subject line needs a lot of work.
How about:
staging: gdm724x: remove unneeded variable in init_usb()
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_usb.c
> b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_usb.c
> index d023f83f9097..8145ae2afba7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_usb.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ static void release_usb(struct lte_udev *udev)
>
> static int init_usb(struct lte_udev *udev)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> int i;
> struct tx_cxt *tx = &udev->tx;
> struct rx_cxt *rx = &udev->rx;
> @@ -326,7 +325,6 @@ static int init_usb(struct lte_udev *udev)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_SDU_BUF; i++) {
> t_sdu = alloc_tx_sdu_struct();
> if (!t_sdu) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -337,7 +335,6 @@ static int init_usb(struct lte_udev *udev)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_RX_SUBMIT_COUNT * 2; i++) {
> r = alloc_rx_struct();
> if (!r) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -349,7 +346,7 @@ static int init_usb(struct lte_udev *udev)
> return 0;
> fail:
> release_usb(udev);
> - return ret;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
Again, you are getting _really_ close to the "churn for churn sake".
Maybe this is needed, but it's really a fine line...
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
