On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:08:25PM +0530, Merwin Trever Ferrao wrote: > From: Merwin Trever Ferrao <merwi...@gmail.com> > > Fixed a coding style issue. > > Signed-off-by: Merwin Trever Ferrao <merwi...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c | 32 ++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c > b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c > index eee1998c4b18..5424e2682911 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c > @@ -324,8 +324,7 @@ static int prism2_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy, > (i < request->n_channels) && i < ARRAY_SIZE(prism2_channels); > i++) > msg1.channellist.data.data[i] = > - ieee80211_frequency_to_channel( > - request->channels[i]->center_freq); > + > ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(request->channels[i]->center_freq);
And now you violate the other coding style rule of too long lines :( You can just keep sending patches fixing this back and forth, if you want a never-ending set of patches to be applied, but we don't really like that. So the code is ok as-is. > msg1.channellist.data.len = request->n_channels; > > msg1.maxchanneltime.data = 250; > @@ -359,15 +358,15 @@ static int prism2_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy, > freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(msg2.dschannel.data, > NL80211_BAND_2GHZ); > bss = cfg80211_inform_bss(wiphy, > - ieee80211_get_channel(wiphy, freq), > - CFG80211_BSS_FTYPE_UNKNOWN, > - (const u8 *)&msg2.bssid.data.data, > - msg2.timestamp.data, msg2.capinfo.data, > - msg2.beaconperiod.data, > - ie_buf, > - ie_len, > - (msg2.signal.data - 65536) * 100, /* Conversion to > signed type */ > - GFP_KERNEL > + ieee80211_get_channel(wiphy, freq), > + CFG80211_BSS_FTYPE_UNKNOWN, > + (const u8 *)&msg2.bssid.data.data, > + msg2.timestamp.data, > msg2.capinfo.data, > + msg2.beaconperiod.data, > + ie_buf, > + ie_len, > + (msg2.signal.data - 65536) * 100, /* > Conversion to signed type */ > + GFP_KERNEL > ); Why is this final ); way over here? > > if (!bss) { > @@ -475,14 +474,13 @@ static int prism2_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct > net_device *dev, > } > > result = prism2_domibset_uint32(wlandev, > - DIDMIB_DOT11SMT_PRIVACYTABLE_WEPDEFAULTKEYID, > - sme->key_idx); > + > DIDMIB_DOT11SMT_PRIVACYTABLE_WEPDEFAULTKEYID, > + sme->key_idx); > if (result) > goto exit; > > /* send key to driver */ > - did = didmib_dot11smt_wepdefaultkeystable_key( > - sme->key_idx + 1); > + did = > didmib_dot11smt_wepdefaultkeystable_key(sme->key_idx + 1); Too long of a line. Remember, checkpatch is just a "hint", you still have to use your brain when looking at the output of it. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel