On 2019/6/18 4:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 02:16:11AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> At last, this is RFC patch v1, which means it is not suitable for
>> merging soon... I'm still working on it, testing its stability
>> these days and hope these patches get merged for 5.3 LTS
>> (if 5.3 is a LTS version).
> 
> Why would 5.3 be a LTS kernel?
> 
> curious as to how you came up with that :)

My personal thought is about one LTS kernel one year...
Usually 5 versions after the previous kernel...(4.4 -> 4.9 -> 4.14 -> 4.19),
which is not suitable for all historical LTSs...just prepare for 5.3...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to