On 2019/7/16 15:35, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Xiang,
>
> On 2019/7/16 15:19, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Hi Chao,
>>
>> On 2019/7/16 15:05, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> Add erofs_bmap() to support FIBMAP ioctl on flatmode inode.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/erofs/data.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/data.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/data.c
>>> index fbce71403d87..03da57f04347 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/data.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/data.c
>>> @@ -308,9 +308,38 @@ static int erofs_raw_access_readpages(struct file
>>> *filp,
>>> return iomap_readpages(mapping, pages, nr_pages, &erofs_iomap_ops);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int erofs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>>> + struct buffer_head *bh, int create)
>>> +{
>>> + struct erofs_map_blocks map = {
>>> + .m_la = iblock << 9,
>>> + };
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = erofs_map_blocks(inode, &map, EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + if (map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_MAPPED)
>>> + bh->b_blocknr = erofs_blknr(map.m_pa);
>>> +
>>> + return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static sector_t erofs_bmap(struct address_space *mapping, sector_t block)
>>> +{
>>> + struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
>>> +
>>> + if (is_inode_flat_inline(inode))
>>> + return 0;
>>
>> could we support flat_inline as well? some difficulty on this?
>
> I think we can support partial of this on inline inode, e.g.:
>
> [0, 4k] mapped
> [4k, 5k] inline
>
> We can find and return the physical block address for first block, but for
> last
> block locating in metadata, we should just return 0 (0 indicate bmap has
> failed
> to get mapped block address).
I think that is fine (in the long term, FIEMAP is preferred of course.)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
