On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for > > these two subsystems. > > Even with that change, I don't see get_maintainers.pl tell me I > shouldn't be sending a patch in for this area:
Nor should you. It's checkpatch that should warn. > > > $ cat x.patch > diff --git a/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig > index 259e053e1e09..d9658c46686e 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ > # UWB device configuration > # > > + > + > menuconfig UWB > tristate "Ultra Wideband devices" > default n > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl x.patch > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> (supporter:STAGING > SUBSYSTEM,commit_signer:2/2=100%,authored:1/2=50%) > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%) > de...@driverdev.osuosl.org (open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:) > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > > Am I missing something? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
